|
|
||||||||
|
|
About the automatic
loader and ammo isolation in the USSR tank design
A. Tarasenko
There is
an opinion that the Soviet tank design, unlike the USA and Western Europe,
relied on the automatic loader and the placement of non-insulated ammunition in
it. But this is not quite true - the USSR tank building is a rather vast
subject, where there were different directions of development, some of which
became serial, and some remained forgotten projects.
The T-64
layout was successful for its time and surpassed the contemporaries M60,
Leopard-1, AMX-30, Chieftain in terms of protection. In
the next generation tanks, full ammunition isolation is realized only on the
Abrams tank. On other projects 2/3 of the ammunition is not isolated. The 1st
attempt to create a tank with fully insulated ammunition was made in the early
1970s.
This was a project known as the
"Object 450" or T-74 (http://btvt.info/2futureprojects/450/450.htm), which was to replace the T-64.
Designer Morozov wrote: One of the main, in our
opinion, drawbacks of the existing "classic design" of the tank,
which basically creates all the obstacles to further improvement of its
tactical and technical performance, is the imperfection of its combat
compartment layout. It resembles a very cramped one-room apartment or a
soldier's duffel bag, in which the crew is crammed with weapons, ammunition,
various mechanisms, rods, wires and other numerous devices and parts. In addition,
all this is moving, rotating, smoking, a source of noise and injuries, an
explosion and fire hazard, creates separation of the crew, makes it difficult
to evacuate them from the tank, does not provide
elementary conditions for work, habitability and much more. In the presented
layout, the so-called combat compartment of the tank has been fundamentally
changed by dividing it into separate, isolated from each other, independent
compartments: fuel, ammunition, armament, crew compartment and support compartment.
Thus, if the
layout of a modern tank of the "classical scheme" is essentially a
tank with two separate compartments: the engine and transmission compartment
and the combat compartment, the presented layout provides for five hermetically
sealed compartments: the motor-transmission, the ammunition compartment, the
crew compartment, the fuel compartment and the armament. Such an isolated
arrangement of the crew, ammunition, fuel and armament inside the tank made it
possible to radically improve and redefine the crew habitability conditions.
The project was not implemented due
to the lack of understanding on the part of the military and the fact that the
design bureaus were busy with the production of tanks based on the T-64
modifications - the so-called clones - the T-72 and T-80.
The second attempt was made by the Kharkiv Morozov Design Bureau in the second half of the 1970s. This was a project designated
"Object 490" (btvt.info/7english/490_e). All ammunition was isolated in
the turret bustle and in an isolated ammunition compartment in the hull. Despite
initial support the vehicle also did not become a production vehicle. Instead,
the main priority was given to the Obiekt 490A project,
where the ammunition was not isolated. There were other projects by supporters
of Morozov's ideas, such as a tank with two guns by Mazurenko where the entire ammunition was removed from the
armored space - btvt.info/7english/490_2
Object 490
The third attempt was made after the
collapse of the USSR in Ukraine in the early 1990s. In general, it was proposed
to install this automatic loader behind the turret (module) on any tank - T-55,
T-64, T-72, and so on. For this purpose, the rear part of the standard turret
was cut off, partitions and the "box" with the loading mechanism
(height = 530mm, width = 2320mm) were installed. Additional armored containers
housed electrical equipment and hydraulic cylinder. The module could be raised
or tilted to the side for maintenance of the motor compartments.
Such implementation of the automatic
loader allowed to increase maintainability, reduce
irrecoverable losses on the battlefield and provide the possibility of
re-equipping for shells of different calibers. This implementation of the
automatic loader allowed to increase maintainability, reduce
irretrievable losses on the battlefield and provide the possibility of
re-equipping for shells of different calibers. Naturally, the entire ammunition
package could not fit in the box - only 18-22 rounds, depending on the design.
Therefore, in such projects as T-72-120, Yatagan and
others it was also supposed to place part of the ammunition in a mechanized
stowage with armored upper part and sides in the hull in place of the old
autoloader.
The area of such a
stowage for 16 rounds was 2 times smaller than the standard autoloader.
But, still not ideal and common to all designs with turret autoloader like K-2, Leclerc, Type-90 and so on (
Although it would not have prevented to make blow out plates in the
bottom of the hull), as, however, in all tanks - the same K-2 half of the ammo
is in the hull, Leopard-2, Leclerc ... On the other
hand, as experience shows, you can not take ammunition in the hull in battle.
But again, the third attempt to create a tank with an isolated ammunition pack
remained in the history of forgotten projects.
Approximate comparison of the area of the onboard projection occupied by
ammunition in the autoloader (excluding the rack tank) and in the bustle
autoloader and hull stowage.
|
|
|||||||
|